ArcANE: Do Role-Playing Language Agents Stay in Character at the Right Time?
Abstract
Role-playing language agents require dynamic character development that evolves through narratives, necessitating benchmarks that evaluate psychological trajectory alignment rather than static factual recall, with ArcANE demonstrating superior performance when character arc information is conditioned into models.
Role-playing language agents (RPLAs) should play characters whose values and behavior evolve as the story progresses, not maintain a fixed persona. Existing benchmarks measure factual recall at a given chapter, not whether responses align with the character's psychological trajectory, especially in scenarios the source text never explores. We introduce ArcANE (Arc-Aware Narrative Evaluation), an automatically constructed benchmark spanning 17 novels and 80 principal characters. A Character Arc segments the narrative into phases along a psychological axis, and each probe poses the same scenario across phases, spanning both situations within the source text and situations beyond it. Across six models and six context modes, conditioning on the Character Arc tops every other context strategy on every model, and the gap is largest on scenarios outside the source text where retrieval has nothing to find. We further fine-tune open-weight models on the same data to obtain ArcANE-8B/32B, which widen the Arc advantage even more on scenarios outside the source text.
Community
Role-playing language agents (RPLAs) should play characters whose values and behavior evolve as the story progresses, not maintain a fixed persona. Existing benchmarks measure factual recall at a given chapter, not whether responses align with the character's psychological trajectory, especially in scenarios the source text never explores. We introduce ArcANE (Arc-Aware Narrative Evaluation), an automatically constructed benchmark spanning 17 novels and 80 principal characters. A Character Arc segments the narrative into phases along a psychological axis, and each probe poses the same scenario across phases, spanning both situations within the source text and situations beyond it. Across six models and six context modes, conditioning on the Character Arc tops every other context strategy on every model, and the gap is largest on scenarios outside the source text where retrieval has nothing to find. We further fine-tune open-weight models on the same data to obtain ArcANE-8B/32B, which widen the Arc advantage even more on scenarios outside the source text.
Really compelling framing. Shifting evaluation from static factual recall to psychological trajectory alignment feels like the right direction for RPLAs, and the out-of-source-text scenarios are a clever stress test where retrieval genuinely can't help.
I'm curious how the Character Arc conditioning holds up on characters with non-linear or ambiguous arcs (like unreliable narrators), where the psychological axis might be harder to segment cleanly. Nice work!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- DynSess: Dynamic Session-Level Evaluation and Optimization Framework for Role-Playing Agents (2026)
- PersonaArena: Dynamic Simulation for Evaluating and Enhancing Persona-Level Role-Playing in Large Language Models (2026)
- From Facts to Insights: A Persona-Driven Dual Memory Framework and Dataset for Role-Playing Agents (2026)
- NARRA-Gym for Evaluating Interactive Narrative Agents (2026)
- ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For (2026)
- SocialMemBench: Are AI Memory Systems Ready for Social Group Settings? (2026)
- Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Multi-Turn Language Models (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper